Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 8:58 pm  

Just not good enough. If saints have payed this muppet a lot of coin for next year then somebody needs sacking and fast. Nothing more i can say really. A loose forward over the age of 33 totally out shone him and directed his team around the pitch to a tee.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:01 pm  

He was shocking.

Kicking poor, tackling poor, attack poor.

Costs Saints the game.

Has never recovered from his injury and probably never will.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:07 pm  

He was never, ever going to recover from that kind of injury. He must of laughed all the way to the bank when Saints gave him another year. Too sentimental and just the same sh@t with a long list of names. No doubt Lomax will retire age 35 having played 5 games a season earning over 100k a year. You can smell it a mile off.

But anyway back to Walsh, pathetic performance. That defense against any decent attacking team is deadly for us.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:28 pm  

wigsey wrote:

He was shocking.

Kicking poor, tackling poor, attack poor.

Costs Saints the game.

Has never recovered from his injury and probably never will.

He got better when he went from passive to aggressive but he is not as quick as he thinks he is doing his darts and had no runners - presumably because no one in the team expected it from him as he hadn't done it much before on the last?

Kicking game from him and Burns was awful though.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:34 pm  

He doesn't look as ruined physically as he did. He's improving in that sense.

However he did't play well tonight. His kicking game as retched and very little he did came off. That can change though.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:35 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

He doesn't look as ruined physically as he did. He's improving in that sense.

However he did't play well tonight. His kicking game as retched and very little he did came off. That can change though.

Yes it made me want to throw up as well.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:38 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

He doesn't look as ruined physically as he did. He's improving in that sense.

However he did't play well tonight. His kicking game as retched and very little he did came off. That can change though.

He can't seem to create anything in tight games. We are so predictable with the ball. It's one up crap with the odd inside ball or short ball to Greenwood.

I'm not sure if it's the fact walsh and burns ain't up to it or it's down to coaching?

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:40 pm  

St pete wrote:

He can't seem to create anything in tight games. We are so predictable with the ball. It's one up crap with the odd inside ball or short ball to Greenwood.

I'm not sure if it's the fact walsh and burns ain't up to it or it's down to coaching?

Coaching I would say.

they are good enough but apart from their shocking kicking game tonight they were spaced too far apart to play as a pair.

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:45 pm  

saint at wire wrote:

Coaching I would say.

they are good enough but apart from their shocking kicking game tonight they were spaced too far apart to play as a pair.

Kicking game was awful tonight. Didn't find grass in the first half and can't beleive we didn't put the ball out for scrum when we was under the pump to slow the game down and stop their momentum

Re: Luke Walsh : Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:48 pm  

St pete wrote:

Kicking game was awful tonight. Didn't find grass in the first half and can't beleive we didn't put the ball out for scrum when we was under the pump to slow the game down and stop their momentum

Yes especially as Leeds had their so called kicking game sussed from the start.