Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:27 am  

And Wigan only had 2.

The guy at the bottom is clapping from the touchline, not playing, "Come on lads, these boys are rubbish".

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:41 am  

Saddened! wrote:

And Wigan only had 2.

The guy at the bottom is clapping from the touchline, not playing, "Come on lads, these boys are rubbish".

PMSL

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:22 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

And the proof.


They had the ten men on for about three minutes.

Looks like the man at the top of the pic is walking off and play has not resumed.

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:46 pm  

I just watched them back and couldn't count 10 at any time. The photo you have posted was during a substitution I think.

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:51 pm  

Oh look.

Rogues is back on the boards and within, what, 24 hours he is already derailing a thread? Must be a record.

Thread is about the 9s competition, not whether there were 10 Featherstone players on the pitch when clearly there weren't, just because Rogues can't accept that his team were booted out by the junior side of the team that almost booted them out of the Challenge Cup.

Back on topic ...

Maybe someone could say whether they would be in favour of more being made of the 9s comp? I think it would be worthwhile developing it.

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 4:51 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Oh look.

Rogues is back on the boards and within, what, 24 hours he is already derailing a thread? Must be a record.

Thread is about the 9s competition, not whether there were 10 Featherstone players on the pitch when clearly there weren't, just because Rogues can't accept that his team were booted out by the junior side of the team that almost booted them out of the Challenge Cup.

Back on topic ...

Maybe someone could say whether they would be in favour of more being made of the 9s comp? I think it would be worthwhile developing it.

Where is he derailing this thread? He is talking about the 9's comp. which is what this thread is about.

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 4:59 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

I just watched them back and couldn't count 10 at any time. The photo you have posted was during a substitution I think.

Not true.
When Wigan scored still Fev had ten men on the pitch and they still did when Wigan went for the power play.

You wouldn't question the great Bilko would you?

Taken from the Wigan site.

Bilko wrote:

And this 10 men thing. I make it at least 2 and half minutes that Featherstone played with 10 men at the start of the second half. We actually scored during that period, but they got to defend a powerplay with 10 men.

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:03 pm  

Agent Mulder wrote:

Where is he derailing this thread? He is talking about the 9's comp. which is what this thread is about.

He wasn't. He was talking about Featherstone and ten men, simply because Wigan lost.

I started the thread to talk about the 9s comp and NOT Wigan getting beaten by a mythical ten men.

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:23 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

He wasn't. He was talking about Featherstone and ten men, simply because Wigan lost.

I started the thread to talk about the 9s comp and NOT Wigan getting beaten by a mythical ten men.

For once, will you please just shut up!!

Re: RL9s Comp : Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:38 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

He wasn't. He was talking about Featherstone and ten men, simply because Wigan lost.

I started the thread to talk about the 9s comp and NOT Wigan getting beaten by a mythical ten men.

He isn't derailing the thread, he's talking about an incident at the competition the thread is about.

You are derailing the thread wittering on about him, so pack it in. You've made your point, you are not interested in what he has to say, so leave it at that and discuss what you want to about the competition.