: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:23 pm  

St pete wrote:

Sgtwilko can you explain my post at top of page then plz

typo's corrcted, and if you meet me in the street its just wilko.

you also had little to say about cunningham testing posative for a band substance

: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:26 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

in all honesty im not sure about goulding but millward was a classic case of enough is enough, that had been coming for some time and was perfect opportunity for saints to get rid if they wanted and they did

Alot of peope on ere are saying this is pryce's 2nd offence 2.

Why did we sack 2 big names yet let pryce off?

Because it don't justify it!

: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:32 pm  

St pete wrote:

Alot of peope on ere are saying this is pryce's 2nd offence 2.

Why did we sack 2 big names yet let pryce off?

Because it don't justify it!

now dont get me wrong mate!! i didnt say pryce should be sacked!! but he wouldnt because of his ability.

thats just my opinion i dont think its just saints but 99% of clubs would do the same.

but lets not all pretend the clubs try and do the right thing. the first thing they look at is how important they player or coach is to the team

: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:09 pm  

Your board has proved themselves to be very weak on this occasion, very poor indeed...

: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:15 pm  

Unlike the Wigan board I suppose?

: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:21 pm  

It could also be a case of the degree of punishment fitting the degree of crime.
"Pryce pushed over her partner"

Cockayne took part in an "appalling" assault in which he repeatedly kicked and punched a man in the head on a night out.

: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:30 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

Your board has proved themselves to be very weak on this occasion, very poor indeed...

A quote from Feka after he was found guilty of the much more serious offence of GBH.
Speaking outside court, 26-year-old Paleaaesina said: "Obviously I pleaded guilty today. It was one of those things. I regret and I am truly sorry for what I have done.

''I want to thank the club and especially the fans for their support. They have supported me from day one.''

Whats the difference?

: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:59 am  

Ski wrote:

So Saints should keep someone who is unproven at the top level, for two years, paying him, when he decieved the club, lied about etc etc, when he cannot repay the club with service in any way?

why have him in the first place then? or why not admit it was simply an excuse rather posturing and moralising?

: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:32 am  

let me get this right.

beer and bad judgment on pryce's part leads him to house/flat where he is confronted by a baseball wielding adult who'm he PUSHES causing him to bang his head on a bin!

SEND HIM TO COVENTRY!

: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:51 am  

Its done, its finished get over it!