Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:34 am  

Can't see Hudds letting Brough go in all honesty. Zak for Brierly is more realistic but as others have said, what we need is someone to organise this team, not another off-the-cuff type of player.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:01 am  

Loyal Leeds Fan wrote:

Can't see Hudds letting Brough go in all honesty. Zak for Brierly is more realistic but as others have said, what we need is someone to organise this team, not another off-the-cuff type of player.

brierley will do nicely for zak. Lets face it were losing zak either way so may as well have a decent player as opppsed to an "undisclosed fee" deal that we see nothing for/garys family paid holiday.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:17 am  

taxi4stevesmith wrote:

:evil: brierley will do nicely for zak. Lets face it were losing zak either way so may as well have a decent player as opppsed to an "undisclosed fee" deal that we see nothing for/garys family paid holiday.

I know what you're saying, but it's a shame it's got to this point as putting the issues with Zak aside it's not a good deal. If Zak must go though it looks like one of the better options. But if you added Brierly to the team last year I'm not sure the season would have ended any differently.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:47 am  

Zak for Brough is a fantastic deal.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:05 pm  

Bang wrote: Zak for Brough is a fantastic deal. Make your mind up!

Bang wrote: Zak for Brough is a fantastic deal. Make your mind up!

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:20 pm  

Haha.Nice bit of work there Nigel.

But he would be OUR cretin. Wonder what made me say cretin? I never use that word.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:47 pm  

We have to sell Hardaker as his salary still remains on our cap if we loan him out and it appears from what GH is saying they've already spent his salary on Segaro/Ferres update. Not sure where the Achurch salary has gone !!

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:11 pm  

cosworth wrote:

We have to sell Hardaker as his salary still remains on our cap if we loan him out and it appears from what GH is saying they've already spent his salary on Segaro/Ferres update. Not sure where the Achurch salary has gone !!

Or falloons or sinnys or peacocks or kylies

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:35 pm  

taxi4stevesmith wrote:

Or falloons or sinnys or peacocks or kylies

Probably a fair bit on upgrades to existing player contracts plus Galloway and Ferres (who will have another upgrade from 2017)

Should be some spare cash though i agree.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:55 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

Probably a fair bit on upgrades to existing player contracts plus Galloway and Ferres (who will have another upgrade from 2017)

Should be some spare cash though i agree.

Yea people seem to forget that to keep the likes of Watkins we will have had to increase his wage significantly. Its not like we can keep him on his accede my wage!
Same goes for Hall Moon and probably Sutcliffe