Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:28 pm  

Ste you might know or be mates with Des Drummond.
But I doubt he would be too happy if you called him a window licker.
That could be why you have got yourself into bother with a couple or so Rhino fans on here.
Well done on getting promotion but try and think before you post in future hey.

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:12 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

tell me what you are struggling with and ill see if I can dumb it down any further for you.

No need to dumb it down SmokeyTA, just check your posts for structure, content & grammatical errors.

You are obviously a man of some intelligence, however when attempting to belittle other forum users you should maybe check that your posts are squeaky clean prior to hitting 'submit'.

Please don't get me wrong, I have picked up some awful habits since I left school, for example, I LOVE to SHOUT, as I have no truck with the office email brigade who believe capitals to be the Devils work, I am also a fan of 'doing this' to emphasise a particular piece.

Some of your posts have missing words & employ mid sentence words to start a new sentence that should be a continuation utilising a comma.

As I type this post on my phone I am probably guilty of a few grammatical faux pas myself, yet I don't feel the need to jump all over the posts of other forum users because they don't understand my posts.

Atomic doesn't like spaces, others have posts littered with spelling mistakes, but remember, nobody likes the grammar police.

FWIW I can decipher your posts quite easily & you make some salient points. I may not agree wholeheartedly with your argument but it has merit.

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:27 pm  

chapylad wrote:

Ste you might know or be mates with Des Drummond.
But I doubt he would be too happy if you called him a window licker.
That could be why you have got yourself into bother with a couple or so Rhino fans on here.
Well done on getting promotion but try and think before you post in future hey.

chapylad, I believe you miss the point. I have incorrectly & maliciously been called out as a racist by two Leeds fans on this forum & is it is, that is libellous.

My post merely highlighted the fact the both are butt ugly lads, as is Eorl Crabtree & look like they have been chasing parked buses & caught a few.

If two Leeds fans are intent on spinning my post to make it appear something it is not then I can't stop them, but it is still libellous !

Why would I call Des a window licker ? Why would one of yours label everyone who supports Leigh as special ?

Remember if you will who it was who did that.

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:45 pm  

So yeah, anyway, Lee Smith looked like he'd put on a bit of weight.

Gassed by a hooker.

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:47 pm  

Ste100Centurions wrote: chapylad, I believe you miss the point. I have incorrectly & maliciously been called out as a racist by two Leeds fans on this forum & is it is, that is libellous. My post merely highlighted the fact the both are butt ugly lads, as is Eorl Crabtree & look like they have been chasing parked buses & caught a few. If two Leeds fans are intent on spinning my post to make it appear something it is not then I can't stop them, but it is still libellous ! Why would I call Des a window licker ? Why would one of yours label everyone who supports Leigh as special ? Remember if you will who it was who did that. As an Equality and Diversity advisor in HM Forces I would like to make the following observations. The term "Window Licker" is used by an individual to denegrate a person they perceve to be of lower intelligence than themselves. It is not considered a general insult regarding appearance. The term is offensive both to the reciprient and to outside observers (the previous posters and in this case me). For an example of how poorly this term is looked at please see the error Lego made: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33079474/lego-apologises-for-window-licker-toy The same can be said for the term "Mong" - again a derogatory term to belittle intelligence; HOWEVER, you expanded the term to "Mongrel". You were referring to Segyaro and have also referenced Albert Kelly. In this sense the term "Mongrel" can be interpreted as a racist remark as both individuals are of aboriginal descent. In the ugly history of racism, “mongrel” has been used to demean couples of different ethnicities and children of mixed race. The use of mongrel also invokes another nasty word, miscegenation, which is a derogatory term for couples of mixed race who marry and have kids. If you were in front of me accused of casual racisim and discrimination toward percieved intelligence I would uphold the case and I would seek to be following a path of suitable resolution. Please refrain from using offensive language and terminology on our board.

Ste100Centurions wrote: chapylad, I believe you miss the point. I have incorrectly & maliciously been called out as a racist by two Leeds fans on this forum & is it is, that is libellous. My post merely highlighted the fact the both are butt ugly lads, as is Eorl Crabtree & look like they have been chasing parked buses & caught a few. If two Leeds fans are intent on spinning my post to make it appear something it is not then I can't stop them, but it is still libellous ! Why would I call Des a window licker ? Why would one of yours label everyone who supports Leigh as special ? Remember if you will who it was who did that. As an Equality and Diversity advisor in HM Forces I would like to make the following observations. The term "Window Licker" is used by an individual to denegrate a person they perceve to be of lower intelligence than themselves. It is not considered a general insult regarding appearance. The term is offensive both to the reciprient and to outside observers (the previous posters and in this case me). For an example of how poorly this term is looked at please see the error Lego made: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33079474/lego-apologises-for-window-licker-toy The same can be said for the term "Mong" - again a derogatory term to belittle intelligence; HOWEVER, you expanded the term to "Mongrel". You were referring to Segyaro and have also referenced Albert Kelly. In this sense the term "Mongrel" can be interpreted as a racist remark as both individuals are of aboriginal descent. In the ugly history of racism, “mongrel” has been used to demean couples of different ethnicities and children of mixed race. The use of mongrel also invokes another nasty word, miscegenation, which is a derogatory term for couples of mixed race who marry and have kids. If you were in front of me accused of casual racisim and discrimination toward percieved intelligence I would uphold the case and I would seek to be following a path of suitable resolution. Please refrain from using offensive language and terminology on our board.

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:53 pm  

put the shovel down ste....you have gone deep enough.

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:38 pm  

vsewo wrote: As an Equality and Diversity advisor in HM Forces I would like to make the following observations. The term "Window Licker" is used by an individual to denegrate a person they perceve to be of lower intelligence than themselves. It is not considered a general insult regarding appearance. The term is offensive both to the reciprient and to outside observers (the previous posters and in this case me). For an example of how poorly this term is looked at please see the error Lego made: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33079474/lego-apologises-for-window-licker-toy The same can be said for the term "Mong" - again a derogatory term to belittle intelligence; HOWEVER, you expanded the term to "Mongrel". You were referring to Segyaro and have also referenced Albert Kelly. In this sense the term "Mongrel" can be interpreted as a racist remark as both individuals are of aboriginal descent. In the ugly history of racism, “mongrel” has been used to demean couples of different ethnicities and children of mixed race. The use of mongrel also invokes another nasty word, miscegenation, which is a derogatory term for couples of mixed race who marry and have kids. If you were in front of me accused of casual racisim and discrimination toward percieved intelligence I would uphold the case and I would seek to be following a path of suitable resolution. Please refrain from using offensive language and terminology on our board. Completely the way I saw it, the term mongrel used to describe there racial heritage, not to say they are ugly, pure racism and he knows it, using the I've got a black friend argument as an excuse, would not be so back if he just admitted the comments were wrong and just apologies

vsewo wrote: As an Equality and Diversity advisor in HM Forces I would like to make the following observations. The term "Window Licker" is used by an individual to denegrate a person they perceve to be of lower intelligence than themselves. It is not considered a general insult regarding appearance. The term is offensive both to the reciprient and to outside observers (the previous posters and in this case me). For an example of how poorly this term is looked at please see the error Lego made: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33079474/lego-apologises-for-window-licker-toy The same can be said for the term "Mong" - again a derogatory term to belittle intelligence; HOWEVER, you expanded the term to "Mongrel". You were referring to Segyaro and have also referenced Albert Kelly. In this sense the term "Mongrel" can be interpreted as a racist remark as both individuals are of aboriginal descent. In the ugly history of racism, “mongrel” has been used to demean couples of different ethnicities and children of mixed race. The use of mongrel also invokes another nasty word, miscegenation, which is a derogatory term for couples of mixed race who marry and have kids. If you were in front of me accused of casual racisim and discrimination toward percieved intelligence I would uphold the case and I would seek to be following a path of suitable resolution. Please refrain from using offensive language and terminology on our board. Completely the way I saw it, the term mongrel used to describe there racial heritage, not to say they are ugly, pure racism and he knows it, using the I've got a black friend argument as an excuse, would not be so back if he just admitted the comments were wrong and just apologies

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:28 pm  

Ste100Centurions wrote:

chapylad, I believe you miss the point. I have incorrectly & maliciously been called out as a racist by two Leeds fans on this forum & is it is, that is libellous.

Only libelous if it's false.

Shall we await your rebuttal of vsewo's post before deciding that?

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:36 pm  

Ste100Centurions wrote:

No need to dumb it down SmokeyTA, just check your posts for structure, content & grammatical errors.

You are obviously a man of some intelligence, however when attempting to belittle other forum users you should maybe check that your posts are squeaky clean prior to hitting 'submit'.

Please don't get me wrong, I have picked up some awful habits since I left school, for example, I LOVE to SHOUT, as I have no truck with the office email brigade who believe capitals to be the Devils work, I am also a fan of 'doing this' to emphasise a particular piece.

Some of your posts have missing words & employ mid sentence words to start a new sentence that should be a continuation utilising a comma.

As I type this post on my phone I am probably guilty of a few grammatical faux pas myself, yet I don't feel the need to jump all over the posts of other forum users because they don't understand my posts.

Atomic doesn't like spaces, others have posts littered with spelling mistakes, but remember, nobody likes the grammar police.

FWIW I can decipher your posts quite easily & you make some salient points. I may not agree wholeheartedly with your argument but it has merit.

I wasnt picking on a grammatical or spelling error. I literally do not know what that sentence meant.

Re: Lee Smith : Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:39 pm  

chapylad wrote:

Ste you might know or be mates with Des Drummond.
But I doubt he would be too happy if you called him a window licker.
That could be why you have got yourself into bother with a couple or so Rhino fans on here.
Well done on getting promotion but try and think before you post in future hey.

What would be your opinion of somebody declaring you or your family/friends ' special ' ?