Re: Jamie Peacock : Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:11 pm  

Wigg'n wrote:

Am I missing the outrage from the rugby league community on Peacock getting a grade A while Charnley received a grade C for the exact same charge?

They both should be charged with grade C, there's too many players abusing the referees at the moment and it needs clamping down on.

Re: Jamie Peacock : Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:18 pm  

Wigg'n wrote:

Am I missing the outrage from the rugby league community on Peacock getting a grade A while Charnley received a grade C for the exact same charge?

Peacock is lucky to only get a Grade A for doing that but as we know players usually get smaller bans when finals (MPG's in this case) are just around the corner.

How many games is Ben Flower missing btw???

Re: Jamie Peacock : Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:49 pm  

Charnley's was completely different to Peacocks. Charnley grabbed and pulled the referee, Peacock simply got in front of him.

We have a grading system, Peacocks was rightly the lowest grading/

Re: Jamie Peacock : Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:10 pm  

He didn't just get infront of him he put his hand on him, as per - https://i.imgur.com/NwjdmQQ.jpg Considering abuse of the match official is so frowned upon by the laws I'm surprised it was the lowest grading possible.

He didn't just get infront of him he put his hand on him, as per - https://i.imgur.com/NwjdmQQ.jpg Considering abuse of the match official is so frowned upon by the laws I'm surprised it was the lowest grading possible.

Re: Jamie Peacock : Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:24 pm  

Wigg'n wrote: He didn't just get infront of him he put his hand on him, as per - https://i.imgur.com/NwjdmQQ.jpg Considering abuse of the match official is so frowned upon by the laws I'm surprised it was the lowest grading possible. He was charged with deliberate contact with a match official, What could possibly be a lower graded offence of making contact with a match official than that?

Wigg'n wrote: He didn't just get infront of him he put his hand on him, as per - https://i.imgur.com/NwjdmQQ.jpg Considering abuse of the match official is so frowned upon by the laws I'm surprised it was the lowest grading possible. He was charged with deliberate contact with a match official, What could possibly be a lower graded offence of making contact with a match official than that?

Re: Jamie Peacock : Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:46 pm  

My point is that I'm surprised they grade contact with officials as low as grade A. I've only ever seen multiple match bans in the past I think.

Re: Jamie Peacock : Tue Sep 27, 2016 8:01 pm  

No further action against Peacock! (or Segeyaro)

Re: Jamie Peacock : Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:22 am  

Touched and grabbed are 2 different things

Re: Jamie Peacock : Wed Sep 28, 2016 7:40 am  

SmokeyTA wrote:

He was charged with deliberate contact with a match official, What could possibly be a lower graded offence of making contact with a match official than that?

Agree with this.

On a wider note it's a tad worrying about Peacock's behaviour. He managed to go an entire career without manhandling a ref or mouthing off to fans yet after leaving Leeds in the space of 1 season he's been offering fans out for a fight in a car park, calling people who disagree with him morons, and having a go at ref's on Twitter.

I hope he regains his composure because otherwise he won't be much use to Hull KR as a bigger version of Ben Cockayne.

Re: Jamie Peacock : Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:46 am  

Him wrote:

Agree with this.

On a wider note it's a tad worrying about Peacock's behaviour. He managed to go an entire career without manhandling a ref or mouthing off to fans yet after leaving Leeds in the space of 1 season he's been offering fans out for a fight in a car park, calling people who disagree with him morons, and having a go at ref's on Twitter.

I hope he regains his composure because otherwise he won't be much use to Hull KR as a bigger version of Ben Cockayne.

My guess is it's frustration. His body won't do what he wants anymore and he's letting the anger out in other ways.
Think maybe Twitter might not be the best place for some people who are used to physical confrontations.