Re: Leeds NEED to sign Rangi Chase : Fri May 27, 2016 11:05 pm  

Leigh still hold Chase's registration if he chooses to return to playing so a non starter even if we wanted to, which we shouldn't.

Re: Leeds NEED to sign Rangi Chase : Sat May 28, 2016 10:55 am  

He's also non-fed trained, which means someone would have to be released to accommodate him.

Other than that, cracking idea. Is Pacific actually Phil Clarke? Talks about as much sense.

Re: Leeds NEED to sign Rangi Chase : Sat May 28, 2016 11:18 am  

I''d have thought a Hooker would have been a priority - not a maverick half-back who cannot tackle for toffee.

Re: Leeds NEED to sign Rangi Chase : Sat May 28, 2016 6:03 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

I''d have thought a Hooker would have been a priority - not a maverick half-back who cannot tackle for toffee.

Have you read any of the other posts on this board? Without a doubt the total consensus is yes we need a good hooker ....and a stand off ....and a couple of bloody miracles

Re: Leeds NEED to sign Rangi Chase : Mon May 30, 2016 9:23 am  

Pacific wrote:

Short term contract until the end of the season. What have Leeds got to lose?

So, is it Iestyn or Emanuele?