Five years for a player who will be 32 when next season starts?
No thanks. Shouldn't be getting any more than 3, probably even only 2.
Well, i kind of agree as the kind of money Farah would command now he would not be worthy of at 34/35 (Although he may still be playing to a good level).2 years with an option of another year should be the deal if we were to go inReally can't see it happening but he would certainly fit the Marquee billing and our pack would look fearsome with his addition.
I even be prepared to go for just 1 year. Then gives us time to think/organise long-term replacements and Farah, who might have limited offers in the NRL with it being so late in the year can still find himself getting a big money deal back in the NRL for 2017.
Also doesn't tie us up to a big money contract for too long with our batch of younger players expecting more money over the next few years.