Re: Nathan Brown : Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:12 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

Schofield

Assistant - Goulding
Conditioner - Alex Murphy
Nutrionist - Peter Roe
Analyst - Peter Fox

This not only provides an "interesting" first 10 mins of every game but also has added benefits to Headingley's local economy.

Re: Nathan Brown : Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:26 pm  

BigRob wrote:

Assistant - Goulding
Conditioner - Alex Murphy
Nutrionist - Peter Roe
Analyst - Peter Fox

This not only provides an "interesting" first 10 mins of every game but also has added benefits to Headingley's local economy.

Agreed!

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:42 am  

What has Brown actually won as a coach??

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:47 am  

thebloodbath wrote:

What has Brown actually won as a coach??

Less relegations than Tony Smith?

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:51 am  

Blue 'n Amber wrote:

Less relegations than Tony Smith?

I wouldn't know.

Could anyone else answer the question:

What has Brown actually won as a coach??

He's been in plenty of finals and good positions but what has he won??????

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:09 am  

thebloodbath wrote:

I wouldn't know.

Could anyone else answer the question:

What has Brown actually won as a coach??

He's been in plenty of finals and good positions but what has he won??????

What difference does it make? What had Mourinho won before managing Porto? What had Smith won before joining Leeds? Or Millward/Anderson before joining Saints?

If you were talking about someone who had coached over here for years you might have a point. but he's a young coach who has only been in the country just over a season and has put together a very, very good side for a club that is historically something of a cellar dwellar. The side looks brilliantly coached, reached a final last year and could well win something this year.

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:10 am  

I'm going to stick up for Brown here on the "what has he won" stakes. Yes he had a talented team in the NRL and never got them over the line but he was a young coach and played with the majority of players that he had to tell what to do. That's a hard thing to do, just ask Darryl Powell.

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:41 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

What difference does it make? What had Mourinho won before managing Porto? What had Smith won before joining Leeds? Or Millward/Anderson before joining Saints?

If you were talking about someone who had coached over here for years you might have a point. but he's a young coach who has only been in the country just over a season and has put together a very, very good side for a club that is historically something of a cellar dwellar. The side looks brilliantly coached, reached a final last year and could well win something this year.

Confusing argument:

Smith - won promotion before joining Leeds

Daniel Anderson - won Coach Of The Year when he was at Warriors IIRC before Saints.

Millward - zilch at Leigh. But turned them from a relegation fearing side to a top side in that division. Which is winning of sorts.

So the above have done something there haven't they before they have gone on to bigger pictures.

I'm interested to know what's he won?? Don't see why it's a bad question to ask?? Honest question - honest answer please.

Some people are very defensive over fair questions.

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:51 am  

thebloodbath wrote:

Smith - won promotion before joining Leeds

If you think getting a team relegated (with a record number of consecutive defeats for a coach who has held on to his job in British Rugby League) then winning a part time league with a full time side is more of an achievement than what Brown has done with Huddersfield, I fear there is little point debating this.

Re: Nathan Brown : Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:58 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

:lol:

If you think getting a team relegated (with a record number of consecutive defeats for a coach who has held on to his job in British Rugby League) then winning a part time league with a full time side is more of an achievement than what Brown has done with Huddersfield, I fear there is little point debating this.

Where have I said:

'winning a part time league with a full time side is more of an achievement than what Brown has done with Huddersfield'

I haven't. You are lying. Simple as that.

I showed you the respect of answering your simple question:

What has Smith won?

I answered that easy question with a fact and then you scorn.

Hmmmm.

You are being very creative with my words and you don't structure your point well at all so there is no point discussing this with you.

'you fear' - not for the first time I bet.