Re: wakefield : Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:32 am  

Wakefield by 22, my machine knows.

Re: wakefield : Tue Apr 14, 2015 11:39 am  

Tony Fax wrote:

Hi guys, long time no speak, eh? I was one of the few today. Always will be *Tony thumps his heart*

For all the fellow old timers on here, the facts from that brilliant game played on 9th March 1980 (Kick off 3.30 pm):

Halifax
1. Jimmy Birts (1 goal, 1 drop goal)
2. Mick O' Byrne
3. Graham Garrod
4. Dave Cholmondeley
5. Keith Waites
6. Johnny Blair (4 drop goals !!!!!!!)
7. Terry Langton
8. Dave Callon
9. Paul O'Hara
10. Alan Wood
11. Mick Scott
12. Dave Busfield
13. Ken Loxton

Subs:
14. Tony Garforth
15. Pete Jarvis

Wakefield
1. Midgeley
2. Fletcher
3. Smith
4. Diamond (1 goal)
5. Juliff
6. Topliss (1 drop goal)
7. Lampkowski
8. Bratt
9. McCurrie
10. Skerrett
11. Rayne (Keith)
12. Rayne (Kevin)
13. Idle

Subs:
14. Tinker
15. McDermott

Ref: S. Wall

Half time: 3-1
Full time: 7-3

Attendance: 12,826

Price of programme: 20p

And I was at that match 'n' all! What a great fan, eh? All the best and keep the faith.

Remember the game well.
Maurice Bamford was very vocal at pitch side throughout the game.
Wakefield were in pretty good form and had been without Topliss for a few games prior. Graham Idle had done a good job as captain in Toppos absence but was displaced as a supposedly fully fit Toppo was brought back in. Mistake?

Re: wakefield : Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:43 pm  

FoxyDread wrote:

Wakefield by 22, my machine knows.

Can you open a bookies? I could do with some quick income.

Re: wakefield : Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:56 am  

sir HaRoLd FaCey wrote:

Can you open a bookies? I could do with some quick income.

Lets see what the bookmakers come out with, I hope they are of the same opinion as yourself, thinking that my machine is hopelessly wrong.

The machine works just off the numbers, myself I can see reasons why the Wakefield team will want to put down a marker in this one, they'll turn up for sure anyone thinking otherwise will get a shock.

Re: wakefield : Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:57 am  

Sir Harold, I'm sure you will be happy with -20/+20 at Bet365. The other companies normally copy them so if you don't use Bet365 you shouldn't have a problem getting on.

I told you my machine knows.

Re: wakefield : Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:34 pm  

Halifax now +22 with Bet365. Have they got a spy on here?

Re: wakefield : Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:44 pm  

FoxyDread wrote:

Halifax now +22 with Bet365. Have they got a spy on here?

Fax with 22 is a very tempting bet.

Re: wakefield : Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:29 pm  

I say Wakefield by 10 - http://www.nothingbutleague.com/challen ... x-preview/

I say Wakefield by 10 - http://www.nothingbutleague.com/challen ... x-preview/

Re: wakefield : Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:52 pm  

FoxyDread wrote:

Halifax now +22 with Bet365. Have they got a spy on here?

Thanks foxy,bet365 is the online bookies I use. They are one of the best online bookies in my opinion.

Anyway fax +22. I am all over that like a rash, just like I was when they gave us +24 against Bradford.

It's been quite easy tipping our games this year cos we don't typically lose by more than 12.

Que the hammering tomorrow haha

Re: wakefield : Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:03 am  

I am a fan of Bet365 as well, just wish they hadn't limited the size of my bets.