I'm not a fan, but if we must have it I feel a losing margin of 12 is too large. Also, if a team get beaten by more than say 30 (or similar good winning margin) the bonus point should be given to the winning team. The bonus point system would then favour the winning team slightly instead of just rewarding loss.
You should have included an option "Not Bothered". I'm not really bothered because it's the same for all teams and at the end of the season the best team will win the GF, bonus point or no bonus point.
While I don't agree with rewarding failure, I actually think the bonus point is good.
Is seems as if there have been a lot more close games since it's introduction, and although a loss is still a loss, if teams had just given up like they have in the past, it would have had a far bigger impact on attendances if the loss margines were bigger.
While I don't agree with rewarding failure, I actually think the bonus point is good.
Is seems as if there have been a lot more close games since it's introduction, and although a loss is still a loss, if teams had just given up like they have in the past, it would have had a far bigger impact on attendances if the loss margines were bigger.
I've actually spoken to people that have said they won't come and watch us because we're winning too easily! Mind you, they were Bradford supporters....
While I don't agree with rewarding failure, I actually think the bonus point is good.
Is seems as if there have been a lot more close games since it's introduction, and although a loss is still a loss, if teams had just given up like they have in the past, it would have had a far bigger impact on attendances if the loss margines were bigger.
Indeed. Limited points difference hadn't appeared to be much of an incentive to keep plugging away in the past, so it's certainly worked in keeping games alive, though I'm intrigued by the idea of lowering the margin.